A Look Ahead For the Lakers

By Chris Gayomali

So Wednesday night, the Phoenix Suns were able to hand the Los Angeles Lakers their final defeat of the season despite the valiant efforts of Kobe Bryant and Lamar Odom. The Suns didn’t even need to play at their best to beat a Laker team riddled with injuries and broken confidence.

The thing that hurts them the most is that every single Laker-save Kobe and perhaps Luke Walton-knows that they are at risk of being dispensable, and they’ve been operating for the last two months under that dark cloud. L.A. fans are ruthless – we’re notorious for wanting results now rather than later.

Which brings me to Andrew Bynum. He was considered a bona fide steal during the mediocre 2005 draft year when he went tenth overall. As one of the last players to ever be drafted straight out of high school, Bynum possesses a lot of physical gifts for someone not yet 20-years-old. All that said and done, he’s young, and it will take years to develop and refine him into the type of player a team will need to win a championship. Granted, he’s not a complete big-man bust (Michael Olowokandi anyone?), but the Lakers are in a situation where their window of opportunity is slowly dimming. Sure, Bynum could very well one day become an All-Star, but from what I see, he doesn’t have the competitive drive or confidence it takes to be a championship center. The argument could be made that he’s young, but if that seed of confidence isn’t planted early enough it might never be seen.

Even though he’s under the wing of Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, he doesn’t have those intangibles that other superstars in the league possess. Case in point: when Jermaine O’Neal came into the league the same year as Kobe back in 1996, he was a bench warmer for the Portland Trail Blazers for a good while before he ever developed. It was only when he was traded and allowed to shine that his stock shot up, as he became an All-Star caliber player. On the contrary, Bynum is expected to perform under the bright Hollywood lights; he’s thrust into an unfair situation that is slowly shattering his confidence. If he stays in L.A., he could perhaps never develop into the type of player Lakers owner Jerry Buss sees.

So what are the Lakers to do? Kobe Bryant’s game is unmatchable. He is the only player in the league whose ferocity on the court matches his talent and intelligence. To say that he doesn’t make his teammates better is a bogus argument. Even if Michael Jordan comparisons are a bit cliché, the fact that they are made speaks volumes about his game. Jordan was surrounded by players that complimented his game, and he in turn made them look better. It was this symbiotic relationship between superstar and role players that led the 90s Chicago Bulls to six NBA championships. The Jordan argument has the privilege of operating under a guise of mysticism; we only remember Mike’s successes, whereas all his shortcomings are conveniently forgotten. To say that Kobe is a ball-hog and Jordan was not is the mark of a superficial fan of the game.

The point is, Kobe’s game is good enough to win a championship because it requires the fewest amount of pieces to compliment him. In all honesty, all the Lakers really need is another decent perimeter defender who can make open shots, some big men who can guard the rim and finish plays, and someone to handle the ball when it’s not in Kobe’s hands. The Lakers need to do everything in their power to land Kevin Garnett. His intensity matches Kobe’s perfectly, and his mere presence around the paint will change the defensive persona of the team. Offensively, the Lakers will always be okay, but having Garnett will give them a post threat that makes the triangle deadly.

The other major trade option is rumored to be Jermaine O’Neal, who I’m not sure would help the Lakers out all that much. He doesn’t have the defensive presence in the interior the Lakers need. His offensive game is unquestionably potent, but that’s not what they need.

A trade I’d like to see happen would be to somehow steal Ron Artest from the misguided Maloof brothers. Phil Jackson is notorious for bringing the best out of “bad” players (i.e. Dennis Rodman), and Artest’s antics would more than likely be channeled into positive results on the court.

Another move I was a fan of was Bynum for Jason Kidd. Even though the Lakers aren’t a fast-break team, they could have essentially been a vastly improved version of the current New Jersey Nets. Imagine how ridiculous Kobe’s game would be if he didn’t have to waste energy handling the ball every possession, and then imagine how much potential Kidd’s game could’ve unlocked out of a player like Odom. Top it off with Kidd’s perimeter defense and you can imagine how formidable the Lakers would be, especially since they’ll likely be battling the Suns in the playoffs for the next couple of years.

The current incarnation of the Lakers is scary when they’re all healthy but with a few tweaks and some veteran leadership, they could very well dominate the league for the next couple of years.


6 responses to “A Look Ahead For the Lakers

  1. delusional! the lakers arent scary on any level other than their sg position. their big men are laughable lamar had one good year in miami but without another legit superstar on that team to spread the floor and keep defenders off of him he’s useless. bynum will never be able to evolve as long as kobe, lamar, and walton are on the team taking his offensive opportunities. the only upside of the lakers future is jordan farmar, he’s going to be average at best, but at least he’ll be solid(well at least more so then smush). you’re doomed to rebuilding for the rest of this decade

  2. Pretty optimistic :[
    Step one: Shitcan Phil Jackson. The triangle just plain doesn’t work in the modern, game; and he can’t deal with a team that isn’t loaded down with star talent that affords him the luxury of sitting on the bench letting them “play out of” tricky situations. He didn’t do a damn thing to Dennis Rodman. He had his best rebounding seasons with Detroit, and didn’t exactly need a whole lot of encouragement from the coaching staff to rip boards away from larger players and toss it to MJ or Pippen. Why they even attempt to set up the triangle is beyond me, they have the personnel to be an excellent run and gun team (if they actually practice transition defense, which im sure they dont because phil is such a huge donk)- because Kobe and Lamar are about twice as scary barrelling towards the opposing basket in the open court as they are in a halfcourt set (not to diminish their offensive potency in a slower gameplan, but when the pace slows down, the mediocrity of the lakers’ support players really shows). KG or JKidd would be great, but to trade a young player like Bynum, who has not even played starting minutes for half of a season yet, for a shot in a ridiculously stacked western conference doesn’t necessarily seem to make sense unless you feel that Kobe only has maybe 2-3 more seasons in him. I’d give Bynum another year before relegating him to the ranks of Shawn Livingston and other teaser “upside” players around the league.

  3. After his abysmal post season performance, I wouldn’t be too opposed to trading Bynum–and yes, i realize how young he is. A swap for Kidd, though it would provide an overall improvment in the team, is a little steep since Kidd is up there in the age department and might not have many years left in the league.

    Ideally, the Lakers would ship Bynum for KG. While Andrew’s upside is enticing, KG is already a proven monster. And he has, i’d say, at least a good 5 years of KG-like play in him, especially if he takes on the role of second-fiddle to Kobe. In my eyes, the prospect of watching KG and Kobe playing together in their primes is too much to pass up, and the odds of success would definitely be greater than if they keep Bynum.

    That’s just my two cents.

  4. Also KG deserves it. Total monster!
    PS fire phil

  5. Keep in mind this evaluation is coming from a fan’s perspective, I’m assuming…

    FYI, the Lakers currently do not run the triangle offense because of the players’ inability to run the system efficiently. They’re a stand-and-watch Kobe shoot the ball team for now.

  6. Bynum sucks. Every single player on the Lakers is expendable with the exception of obviously Kobe. It’d be great if we could keep Lamar as the third best player on the team, but Kupchak better not hesitate to pull the trigger on anyone or any combination of players (i.e. Lamar + Bynum) for a superstar like K.G. or Kidd.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s