On Boxing Coverage and Pacquiao-Hatton

By Chris Le

There’s an old adage in boxing that says you’re only as good as your last fight.  Meaning, the perception of any particular fighter is determined by his most recent result.  It’s the ultimate “what have you done for me lately?” criteria.  And really, with current sports fans’ obsession with the now and our tendency to be captives of the moment, this axiom is applicable to all sports.  In this sense, we have the memory of a newborn baby.  It happens, without failure, before every postseason.  A once-hot team that takes a midseason turn for the worse, but still manages to stumble into the playoffs, they are brushed aside — until they go on a tear, at which point everyone flip-flops again, jumping right back onto their bandwagon (the Arizona Cardinals, anyone?).

The sport of boxing, however, finds itself a unique situation.  It has changed a bit since the proverb’s advent, since the golden age when fights were aired on network television.  Changed in the sense that it’s, uh, dying.  The casual fan no longer cares about the sport’s non-premier matchups, reserving their attention to those fights previewed on ESPN, and as we all know, ESPN only covers the bouts that fall into the “Fight of the Year” category. When was the last time you saw Stuart Scott and Scott Van Pelt profile a “Boxing After Dark” matchup?

ESPN doesnt care about boxing.

ESPN doesn't care about boxing.

So the saying needs to be modified a bit.  It should now read: In the public eye, you’re only as good as your last mega Pay-Per-View fight that was showcased on SportsCenter.

Taking this into account, the general public probably views tomorrow’s fight as being between the Manny Pacquiao who destroyed Oscar De La Hoya and the Ricky Hatton who was battered by Floyd Mayweather Jr.  In reality, however, only half of this equation is true.  The Manny Pacquiao that enters the ring will be the pound-for-pound king of boxing, the one that humiliated the Golden Boy into retirement.  This much is true.  But he’ll be facing a new-look Ricky Hatton.  If anyone expects the plodding, head-first brawler that was dissected by Mayweather, they’ll be sorely mistaken.  No, the Hatton we’ll see will resemble the one who stopped Paul Malignaggi back in November.  (I bet you didn’t know Hatton fought since his loss to Mayweather.  In fact, he’s had two bouts; the Malignaggi victory and a decision over Juan Lazcano.  Thanks for keeping us informed, ESPN!)

Hatton’s move to bring in the audacious Floyd Mayweather Sr. to head his training camp is a good career move.  As senile as Mayweather Sr. comes off at times, and he does to great extent, particularly when he rhymes like a wannabe Muhammad Ali, he’s a decent enough trainer — at least for Hatton.  If anything, he’ll instill in Ricky basic defensive maneuvers (like ANY semblance of head movement, parrying and blocking punches with his gloves and arms as opposed to his face, all of which were absent in his previous career) which will benefit him, particularly against someone like Pacquiao who likes to mix things up and doesn’t shy away from a brawl.

The best fighter in the world

The best fighter in the world.

But in the end, it won’t make that much of a difference.  It will merely delay the inevitable.  Instead of being blitzed out in the first few rounds from a barrage of head-snapping blows, Hatton will have a moment or two of his own . . . until the mid-to-late rounds, when he’ll be stopped from a barrage of head-snapping blows.  There’s no one on the planet that can handle Pac-Man, and that includes the Hitman.

Prediction: Pacquiao by late-round stoppage.

Advertisements

4 responses to “On Boxing Coverage and Pacquiao-Hatton

  1. You just had to put up a picture of Stuart Scott and his wandering eye, didn’t you?

    Yeah, Pac-Man’s a heavy favorite. Pac-Man vs. Floyd (after he dismantles Marquez) at the end of 2009 for the ultimate mega fight?

  2. Hi, interesting post. I have been pondering this topic,so thanks for writing. I’ll definitely be coming back to your blog.

  3. Hi, good post. I have been wondering about this topic,so thanks for sharing. I will certainly be coming back to your posts. Keep up great writing

  4. Today i spent 300 dollars for platinium roulette system , i
    hope that i will make my first $$$ online

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s